Which of the following can contribute to a financial hardship for either party in a supervision agreement?

The supervisor’s distance from the candidate can significantly contribute to a financial hardship in a supervision agreement. When the supervisor is located far from the candidate, it may lead to increased travel expenses for in-person meetings, consultations, or supervision sessions. This can create a logistical burden that could translate into higher costs for the candidate, particularly if they need to travel long distances frequently.

Furthermore, if the supervision is primarily remote but requires occasional in-person meetings, the need to travel can compound financial pressures, especially if those costs are not covered by the employer or by reimbursement policies. This situation can create barriers for candidates who may already be managing tight budgets, particularly if they are early in their careers or in fields where pay is limited. This financial strain can ultimately impact the supervisory relationship and the quality of supervision, making it crucial to consider the geographic proximity of supervisors and candidates when structuring supervision agreements.

The other factors, while they may influence aspects of the supervision arrangement, do not directly create tangible financial burdens in the same way that distance does. The previous experience and area of expertise of the candidate primarily affect the quality and type of supervision rather than financial implications. The payment structure for services can influence financial aspects but is less about the supervision itself and more about the agreed